/interface bridge add name=bridge1 /interface bridge port add interface=wlan1 bridge=bridge1 /interface bridge port add interface=wlan2 bridge=bridge1
I make wlan1 station mode but what about wlan2 ? ap bridge or just bridge or something elsejust create a bridge in RB493G and add wlan1 and wlan2 to itCode:Select all/interface bridge add name=bridge1 /interface bridge port add interface=wlan1 bridge=bridge1 /interface bridge port add interface=wlan2 bridge=bridge1
so you need to change the wlan1 to station wdsMode station
This is standard mode that does not support L2 bridging on station - attempts to put wireless interface in bridge will not produce expected results. On the other hand this mode can be considered the most efficient and therefore should be used if L2 bridging on station is not necessary - as in case of routed or MPLS switched network. This mode is supported for all wireless protocols.
Still searchingAP modes:
ap-bridge - Basic access point mode.
bridge - Same as ap-bridge, but limited to one associated client.
wds-slave - Same as ap-bridge, but scan for AP with the same ssid and establishes WDS link. If this link is lost or cannot be established, then continue scanning. If dfs-mode is radar-detect, then APs with enabled hide-ssid will not be found during scanning.
Because there is security cameras to connect,is there a solution to connect a security camera at 192.168.1.4 from 192.168.2.3 ?I have a question, Why do you want to have a bridge network like this while you can separate broadcast domain?
If the point is access users to Internet, in first router add some new rule (NAT) to allow the other users with different IP access the Internet.
Yes off course. That's called "routing". That's what a router is made for.Because there is security cameras to connect,is there a solution to connect a security camera at 192.168.1.4 from 192.168.2.3 ?I have a question, Why do you want to have a bridge network like this while you can separate broadcast domain?
If the point is access users to Internet, in first router add some new rule (NAT) to allow the other users with different IP access the Internet.
OK, dude, it seems i need to read morewhere should i begin ?Yes off course. That's called "routing". That's what a router is made for.Because there is security cameras to connect,is there a solution to connect a security camera at 192.168.1.4 from 192.168.2.3 ?I have a question, Why do you want to have a bridge network like this while you can separate broadcast domain?
If the point is access users to Internet, in first router add some new rule (NAT) to allow the other users with different IP access the Internet.
Regarding the use of a routed network or bridge is more an issue of the traffic demand and available capacity of the routers.
In a broadcast domain all traffic goes to all nodes. Thus if many units in the same network produce a lot of traffic (Camera's!) it is almost asking for delays in the network due capacity issues (collisions).
But for relative small networks with not so much traffic it is an easy way to make things work by using a fully bridged environment.
One of the disadvantages of bridging is also that bridged unit are transparent and for troubleshooting it is more difficult to find where things go wrong.