Community discussions

MikroTik App
piwi3910
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 5:02 pm
Location:Belgium
Contact:

Support for IPSEC accelerators???

Fri Apr 22, 2005 4:55 pm

is something like this supported

http://www.abit-usa.com/products/server ... &model=185

it has a cavium IPSEC accelerator on it..
can't find nothing on it in the manual so probaly not supported.
but just asking...
Top
User avatar
Eugene
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 986
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 5:06 pm
Location:Cranfield, UK

Mon Apr 25, 2005 3:25 pm

Yup, not supported
Top
piwi3910
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 5:02 pm
Location:Belgium
Contact:

But it would be cool

Mon Apr 25, 2005 3:40 pm

400Mbit vpn ipsec 3des traffic...

if it would be supported i would put ipsec vpn over all our connections...

but it's not...:(
Top
User avatar
Eugene
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 986
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 5:06 pm
Location:Cranfield, UK

Mon Apr 25, 2005 3:46 pm

The majority of CPU power will go to interrupt processing...:D
Last edited byEugeneon Mon Apr 25, 2005 3:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
piwi3910
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 5:02 pm
Location:Belgium
Contact:

damm

Mon Apr 25, 2005 3:48 pm

它总是相同的。
if you think you found something cool... better think again..
my bad.

better just upgrade my hardware...
Top
User avatar
Eugene
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 986
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 5:06 pm
Location:Cranfield, UK

Re: damm

Mon Apr 25, 2005 3:50 pm

better just upgrade my hardware...
It would be the most reliable solution.
Top
piwi3910
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 5:02 pm
Location:Belgium
Contact:

ps

Mon Apr 25, 2005 3:51 pm

could you look in to my other topic about the intel chipset problem??

thxs man
Top
User avatar
stephenpatrick
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 12:26 pm
Location:UK
Contact:

Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:08 pm

IMHO
我坚持“未来plan" to support IPSEC accelerators -

- Soekris sell hardware encryptor mini-PCI cards
- there are linux drivers for them

and from competing "solutions"
- CISCO now have hardware accelerators in their low-end routers

and it should means you are be able to use a cheaper/lower heat CPU on the mainboard.

Regards
Top
User avatar
lastguru
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 432
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 9:04 pm
Location:Certified Trainer/Consultant in Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:55 pm

On Cisco they could probably make a difference as it is not based on PCI architecture. But all MiniPCI cards provide no or little improvement (or even a decrease in spead on fast processors!!!) as all the information has to travel at least 3 times on PCI bus, no matter how fast the device is (and note that I have just forgot to mention additional interrupts generated by the "accelerator"). Of course, on heavy algorithms and 200MHz processors I could probably understand the presence of a throughput gain, but if we are talking about 1GHz+ systems, then the CPU can encrypt the data faster than PCI bus latency. A win-win strategy is to embed encryption coprocessors in either CPUs (like VIA does) or in network cards (like most wireless chip manufacturers do, but that coprocessors are not going to make any IPsec)
Top
User avatar
stephenpatrick
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 12:26 pm
Location:UK
Contact:

Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:20 pm

Ah that makes lots of sense -

Soekris makes/sells 266MHz CPU boards, and that's where the IPSEC cards come into their own - CPU power is limiting, rather than PCI bus bandwidth/interrupt rates.
I guess there will be further developments in this space ...

Regards
Top
User avatar
Eugene
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 986
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 5:06 pm
Location:Cranfield, UK

Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:29 am

You can use hardware aes encryption in RouterOS with some wireless interfaces.

As about standalone IPsec accelerators, they dramatically decrease performance on small packets even on RB 200 (remember about interrupts!), but give a noticeable gain on large ones (and yes, only on slow systems).
Top

Who is online

Users browsing this forum:FurfangosFrigyes,Google [Bot]and 20 guests