I could not find anything related to this CVE
*) download WinBox specific files from router only into AppData folder and not anywhere else (CVE-2020-5720);
I can confirm that this now closes the remote code execution bug possible by a MITM. Using winbox auto update should be safe for now.*) improved MikroTik signature checking on WinBox update;
creating Window Class routeros_null creating Window Class routeros_connect DPI=100 EMS=13 ERROR: bad bmp format id=2329 biPlanes=1, biBitCount=1, biCompression=0 ERROR: bad bmp format id=3329 biPlanes=1, biBitCount=1, biCompression=0 creating Window Class routeros_dbl_canvas DPI CHANGED to 120 rescale font 100 to 120 EMS=16 discovery started rescaning
creating Window Class routeros_null creating Window Class routeros_connect DPI=100 EMS=13 ERROR: bad bmp format id=2329 biPlanes=1, biBitCount=1, biCompression=0 ERROR: bad bmp format id=3329 biPlanes=1, biBitCount=1, biCompression=0 creating Window Class routeros_dbl_canvas discovery started rescaning
The same happened here using Wine 5.0.Had to downgrade back to 3.20. Does not work well with a resolution of 3840x2160. Log was unreadable with lines overlapping.
Drink more Wine, the problem may go away!Actually, now I tried it multiple times, it alternates between DPI=100 mode and DPI=120 mode.
It doesn't matter whether "wine" or "wine64" is used.
Also, it shrinks the window every time (relative to the previous time it picked the same DPI mode). This is quite irritating.
I 100% agree. Why the hell I have to scroll now, where up till 3.20 I had everything fit nicely in one screen? This change was completely unnecessary!I'll go slightly against the flow. Everyone seems to want things bigger, but I'd rather have them smaller. Or maybe better term would be more condensed. It's about one specific thing, line height.
Where can I get 3.20? This is pretty bad .....Had to downgrade back to 3.20. Does not work well with a resolution of 3840x2160. Log was unreadable with lines overlapping.
+1I'll go slightly against the flow. Everyone seems to want things bigger, but I'd rather have them smaller. Or maybe better term would be more condensed. It's about one specific thing, line height.
Come on guys, this is ridiculous. MikroTik changes line height. The next days you have to add one more firewall rule and MikroTik has to change line height again? Or how it is meant to go? Copy terminal output of "/ip firewall export" to your favorite text editor and set font size to 1. Now you can view all of your settings whatever winbox update gets released.+1I'll go slightly against the flow. Everyone seems to want things bigger, but I'd rather have them smaller. Or maybe better term would be more condensed. It's about one specific thing, line height.
Finally I see someone talking about UIefficiencyand not looks!
I too want to be able to see as much information as possible in a single screen without scrolling.
I sent the details to support under the ticket #SUP-7835.null31- Can you reproduce this crash constantly? What exactly do you do? If I click with the mouse right button on a file and choose "Download" option, then WinBox works just fine for me
The thing is it is not only FW rules, it is everything. Every single window now has less viewable data to work with, which makes your advice to copy it elsewhere even more riddiculous.
Come on guys, this is ridiculous. MikroTik changes line height. The next days you have to add one more firewall rule and MikroTik has to change line height again? Or how it is meant to go? Copy terminal output of "/ip firewall export" to your favorite text editor and set font size to 1. Now you can view all of your settings whatever winbox update gets released.
But I do whatwiki:Notesay... and CLI & WinBox difference: .Note is not for art, it's for notes.
Really curious to test that...font size can be increased/decreased under "Settings/Zoom In" or "Zoom Out"
Sorry but what you say is not correct. ROS give us one Note for CLI and WinBox - not separated.As I wrote ... use any editor to prepare your logo and just paste it into a note.
Finally! Thanks!*) added support for HiDPI displays;
QHD, and I still prefer it smaller than the default.People who asked to do the interface smaller probably work on a FullHD monitor because on a 4K monitor (3840x2160) the interface looks incredibly small even with the maximal zoom.
Please make the interface bigger or add more zoom levels.
Log window (only!) is totally unreadable because the top and bottom of every line is sheared off.
a fix for log window is needed before this can be used in production.
+1Log window (only!) is totally unreadable because the top and bottom of every line is sheared off.
a fix for log window is needed before this can be used in production.
Furthermore, /log print in Terminal is also useless because scrolling back Terminal screen to anything before the final contents results in sheared off, unreadable lines. With new WInbox, it is impossible to examine log at all without drag-and-dropping log file to local PC and examining it there. And this causes you to lose "memory" entries. Very bad regression.
This is great!Log entry DPI issue already fixed in internal build.
How did they fix this? I reported above that the log window columns crop the data at the right side edge because the columns are too narrow in the zoomed view. They also lack headers to be able to manually resize them to the desired width.Log entry DPI issue already fixed in internal build.
I guess Normis' answer means that the fix is already done and is waiting for the next release (presumably 3.22).How did they fix this?Log entry DPI issue already fixed in internal build.
I reported above that the log window columns crop the data at the right side edge because the columns are too narrow in the zoomed view. They also lack headers to be able to manually resize them to the desired width.
RouterOS long-term 6.45.8Just the opposite, there is no longer any possibility to use unsecured connection in Winbox.
Like SNI?In any https comunication the encryption is befor of any transfer of data.
Did you ever check howSNIactually works?... I refer to SSL/TLS encryction use in Https.
In this case the SNI is not applicable,