. Also, it would have been even better if the power supplies had been hotswapable. The extra storage is also a good thing. I'm sure we can find creative ways of using it
.
ARM v7 Dual-Core @ 800 MHzWhich CPU architecture running RouterOS in CRS326-24G-2S+RM? ARM, MIPSBE or SMIPS? How it compares with CPU performance of CRS125 or CRS226?
So, similar to the RB3011 being ARM, except a little better than half the clockspeed. IPSEC will be software only until they enable hardware IPSEC? Likely be RouterOS V7 unless I missed something? Could be able to route ~500Mb without fastpath?ARM v7 Dual-Core @ 800 MHzWhich CPU architecture running RouterOS in CRS326-24G-2S+RM? ARM, MIPSBE or SMIPS? How it compares with CPU performance of CRS125 or CRS226?
As far as i know it is single core, at least routerboard.com backs me up on that.ARM v7 Dual-Core @ 800 MHz
Why does the newsletter state 100m distance when 1km is achievable on that frequency:[*]802.11ad 60GHz Qualcomm and MikroTik press release
Frequency alone does not achieve anything. It depends on the transmitter and size (and gain) of the antenna, among many other things.Why does the newsletter state 100m distance when 1km is achievable on that frequency:[*]802.11ad 60GHz Qualcomm and MikroTik press release
Wireless Wire 60G Gigabit Ethernet extender that provides advanced connectivity
between buildings up to 100 meters.
RB3011 based on IPQ8064: 2 cores Krait 300 at 1.4 GHz, that similar to Cortex-A15.So, similar to the RB3011 being ARM, except a little better than half the clockspeed. IPSEC will be software only until they enable hardware IPSEC? Likely be RouterOS V7 unless I missed something? Could be able to route ~500Mb without fastpath?ARM v7 Dual-Core @ 800 MHzWhich CPU architecture running RouterOS in CRS326-24G-2S+RM? ARM, MIPSBE or SMIPS? How it compares with CPU performance of CRS125 or CRS226?
Or is the ARM architecture in this one significantly different than the RB3011 and I shouldn't draw conclusions?
CRS326-24G-2S+RM based on Marvell Prestera DX 98DX3236As far as i know it is single core, at least routerboard.com backs me up on that.
wAP 60G is small unist. Vawe length on 60 Ghz is only 5 mm.Why does the newsletter state 100m distance when 1km is achievable on that frequency:[*]802.11ad 60GHz Qualcomm and MikroTik press release
Wireless Wire 60G Gigabit Ethernet extender that provides advanced connectivity
between buildings up to 100 meters.
Stacking! You really need stacking on these! The CPU supports that, and this may be very nice extension for your model line. Very attractive price is good, but ability to connect several switches into one virtual device/chassis may be the killer feature.new Dual Boot RouterOS/SwOS 24-port switch CRS326-24G-2S+RM, $199
Can't you just connect two 24 port switches? Still more affordable为什么没有48端口交换机吗?我们哈ve to use other manufacturers for this...just seems strange.
A 48 port switch only takes up 1u, compared to 2u with 2 x 24 port switches. Which is important for switch installs in risers or tight spaces or multiple switches in a cabinet. The price is not always everything.Can't you just connect two 24 port switches? Still more affordable
User Manager (not currently on RB1100AHx4, which is an ARM device), Dude, Logs, SMB (file share), Proxy cache.Internal storage for what purpose we can use other then Dude.
User Manager, Dude, Logs, SMB (file share), Proxy cache, GraphsInternal storage for what purpose we can use other then Dude.
Rain and fog contains Oxygen )@DmitryAVNET
60 GHZ is Not that much affordable for Rain / FOG
60Ghz had Maximum attenuation for Oxygen
Water is about 24 GHz
They are on the RB960PGS, so I would expect the same with the RB960PGS-PB. As far as I can tell, it's the same device, in an outdoor case.With the powerbox pro, are the PoE ports individually controllable?
It's the molecule as a whole that absorbs certain wavelengths/frequencies/energies, much more so than the individual atoms that are bound in the molecule. (Below ionizing radiation, anyway.)Rain and fog contains Oxygen )@DmitryAVNET
60 GHZ is Not that much affordable for Rain / FOG
60Ghz had Maximum attenuation for Oxygen
Water is about 24 GHz
air => 0.2102+ 0.79 N2
rain => air + water => (0.2102+ 0.79 N2) + H2O
fog => air + water => (0.2102+ 0.79 N2) + H2O(atomized water)
No, this just implies, that this device is meant to be primarily used as a switch, and it's CPU will not easily handle all the ports in routing mode with processing and at full speed. You can of course use all ports for routing, but then you should better look at some of our CCR series devices, not a switch. The performance of the CPU for routing tasks will be published shortly on this page:How fast can the CRS326 route with/without NAT, with/without "usual" QoS settings?
And what does it mean that routing can be done on some ports? Do I have to physically connect one of those "router ports" to one of the "switch ports" to make any use of the fact that this is a 24+2 port unit?
Thanks for noticing, we will correct these. Please note that we are an all-latvian company located in Latvia (Europe). We are trying, but sometimes a few typos can slip by.On a complete off topic side note: That PDF is an official company flyer and forms people's impression of MikroTik. You should take those extra minutes before releasing the newsletter to get the spelling right. There is no "get's" and you should take care of your it's/its and do/does (the last one found on the CRS's website).
Thanks! I'll be looking forward to the results!The performance of the CPU for routing tasks will be published shortly on this page:
https://routerboard.com/CRS326-24G-2SplusRM
Very much looking forward to this myself, too.The performance of the CPU for routing tasks will be published shortly on this page:
https://routerboard.com/CRS326-24G-2SplusRM
)The other word is disruptiveIs there already any news on the availability of the 60Ghz devices?
I have seen it working fine in the MUM Milan in March/April.
我们哈ve usage for such devices. I believe they can give high capacity backhaul up to 150mtrs.
We already use other 60Ghz solution much to our satisfaction. We have links of 350 and 450 meters running full Gb capacity (aggregated) with 0-1ms latency. Hope Mikrotik can achieve the same.
And if the price is like we are used to with Mikrotik, it can be a very interesting product.
At the Mum there was also words about 60Ghz in a LHG form format. To get the higher gain needed to bridge some bigger distances. The other solution works with either 36 or even 42dBi antenna.
14dBm outpur radio. How much is the Mikrotik solution?
The info for MUM Milan was "Finally some great news on wireless from Mikrotik!" but to be honest 60Ghz solution could be something "great" but so far I am quite dissapointed..... The other small wifi stuff can hardly be called "great news" and is more for niche markets.
We WISPs are waiting for solutions to upgrade our networks. wave2ac, higher capacity AP's and other frequencies like 60Ghz, 24Ghz, 11Ghz etc. Only a glimps on 60Ghz that is still not available can hardly be called "great". (Bwah, I hear this word "Great" to often anyway nowadays... a lot of humbug if you'd ask me.)
Keeping in mind its 800 Mhz 1-core CPU I'd say you shouldn't expect much better throughput that you may have with 2011 series. Maybe 100-130 Mbps, from what I can imagine (as a office internet router, that is, WAN with NAT and some inter-VLAN routing).is there an ETA for the routing stats of CRS326?
CRS326-24G-2S+RM 98DX3236A1 all port test Mode Configuration 1518 byte 512 byte 64 byte kpps Mbps kpps Mbps kpps Mbps Bridging none (fast path) 81.3 987.3 235.0 962.6 296.0 151.6 Bridging 25 bridge filter rules 81.3 987.3 90.7 371.5 90.9 46.5 Routing none (fast path) 81.3 987.3 235.0 962.6 261.9 134.1 Routing 25 simple queues 81.3 987.3 112.6 461.2 111.5 57.1 Routing 25 ip filter rules 59.8 726.2 61.4 251.5 59.5 30.5Normis, may I please ask you recommendation how to figure out the approximations for NAT performance keeping in mind these "performance" tables you've cited above?You can see the Ethernet test (routing mode) and the Switch test (switching mode) results on the product page:
One of the "routing" rows in that case. Probably a bit faster than the "25 filter" rules, but slower than bridging mode.Normis, may I please ask you recommendation how to figure out the approximations for NAT performance keeping in mind these "performance" tables you've cited above?You can see the Ethernet test (routing mode) and the Switch test (switching mode) results on the product page:
You see, while some device can route, say, 726.2 Mbps in 512 bytes packets, there is no hope it can work at that speed at NAT operation, right?