Yes you can do that.

You assign the IPs on the PPPoE servers using secrets or radius, and then announce the /27 in ospf networks

As each client connects OSPF will announce the /32 which has been assigned.

Nick

Sorry, Winebottler...


http://winebottler.kronenberg.org

Actually, if you use Winebox, you don't need X11 at all. You can run it natively quite nicely.

PPPoE now will support RFC4638
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4638

6.33rc15 will be released today.

*) pppoe - added support for MTU > 1492 on PPPoE;

carrierlost, the single TCP optimization is only for the 802.11 wireless protocol and not for the Nv2.

+1 for nv3

I need Skins for Winbox, just like Webfig. And a Test Button, for apply changes during X seconds.

So do you have 40 clients, and you would like to provide for them 10Mbit/sec ?

After some days of use 6.27 on ALL my 200 network devices
(i have also near 4000 CPE all upgraded up to to 6.20, and 4 Gateway for PPPoE all forced to 6.7 for the unresolved bug also described on my signature)

Normis, please hide that floating header on the forum, it just disturbs and nothing else...

+1

easy to access "View Active Topics" without scrolling to top

Normis, please hide that floating header on the forum, it just disturbs and nothing else...

try HT MCS 12 or HT MCS 13 with auto tdma on ROS 6.19 (6.25) with wireless fp package.
signalstrength should not be worse than -70 (all in range 60-70)

you are brave gui, if trying to feed 10mbit/s to 40 clients. i think max clients in your situation is 20 with 40Mhz channel

I would like to test the new version, but where is it?
The download page shows "all_files_6.25rc.zip", but is coming v6.26rc2 to me.

After 6.23 update I have port flapping on SXT lite 5.

Please send the supout.rif file to MikroTIk support for inspection.

Judging by datasheet this models should support ethernet standard 1.25G, so it should also work in our HW.

I have another doubt, do I have to invert H and V polarization chain?

I guess no ..unless you are going to put rx/tx onto different single chain

Yes, it will be better for your ptp link.
With a good antenna like a Jirous Parabolic you will have 3-5db less noise.

ahh....


If you not using VoIP/SP, port 5060?

If it works, it's ok

Think of it like this :
The stations will use auto as frequency and this parameter is used on ap-bridge or bridge. This frequency will be used if you switch that interface to ap.

Thank you for your reply!

So you have all queues on the concentrator?

The CPU on most routerboards isn't fast enough for TCP testing. Use a normal PC behind the device at test.

For bandwidth testing use only devices connected behind the tested link. Do not use btest on devices you are actually testing.

well, until you not give more details, i cannot give advice...
Maybe can you give a photo of your POP site, and city name? (even in private)

well, until you not give more details, i cannot give advice...
Maybe can you give a photo of your POP site, and city name? (even in private)

well, until you not give more details, i cannot give advice...
Maybe can you give a photo of your POP site, and city name? (even in private)

in my practice, the gain (dB) is not the only measurement of the antennas.
You know, the antenna is focusing the beam. If you have 2 antennas with 120deg on both, but different gains, the higher gain will have tighter beam.

RFE's sector much worse than UBNT's. Not to mention Titanium.
my 2 cents.