I had the same error today 6.49.6
CAPSMAN running on same device as interfaces
resolved by setting the caps-man-addresses=192.168.199.1 (ip of system)

exposing the details of the various items kept within the dude database via the cli would be a massive help. Currently the details of Devices for example are all accessible via winbox but if I do a /dude device print detail Then I get just the device name - having ip address, type, status etc. here ...

We are experiencing problems with the dude since upgrade to 6.47.2 - viewing maps is fine but as soon as you open a node to edit or view detail the dude exits and reconnects.

if you use the dude to monitor then you can get this value using a function

http://routerboard.com/has test results for every device

Morning all, We are a small ISP and currently have a CCR1016-12S-1S+ in a colo facility which is handling everything our connections to peering partners and incoming client connections. We now have a few hundred pppoe sessions running on this device and performance becomes a problem when we have a p...

bump - still not getting anywhere further with this - any ideas appreciated

Hi All, I am not sure what is going on here, I have a new RB411U with a simcom 5220 card in it. I just cant extablish an internet link no matter what I try. It all seems to work fine as i can see the device and its channels under the ports [admin@MikroTik] /port> pr Flags: I - inactive # NAME CHANNE...

I got a wierd one. I have a nicely working point to point wireless setup using mtik 4.6 and routerboards w R52n cards running n@5Ghz. From my windows 7 machine I can ping everywhere. I can RDP/fileshare to Windows XP machines over the link. I can't RDP/Fileshare to Windows 7/2008 over the link as I ...

if only all the folk who are generating decent speeds would share their config secrets with the rest of us mere mortals..

I really don't understand if I am doing something completely wrong or not.. I am still getting "extensive data loss" / "not polled for too long" dropping me every 5 seconds or so on my one connection. On the other where there is only 100m of open space separating 2 flat panels (w...

谢谢Chupaka,但已经尝试过这个提示了by you in another topic - I tried a few values right up to max of 15 with no change. The thing that gets me is that this was nice and stable and fast for the first 20 minutes and then it just went pear shaped. The only thing I can think of that chang...

Hi All, I have been battling with this now for hours and have tried all the suggested fixes I found in the forums with no improvement. When I brought up this link it worked great for some time and then started dropping giving me the following log in a long loop 02:12:37 wireless,info 00:0C:42:61:2C:...

Hi, Apologies for the dumb question, but after searching about I have found nothing useful. I have setup a RB750 as the gateway on our network with firewalling, NAT, Queues and some VPN's etc. (Mostly put together from posts on the wiki and other sources) Things are working nicely, but in my queues ...

just tried upgrading to 4.0 on both ends with same problem.

I am on RouterOS 3.29 and am also experiencing the problem of l2tp server responding on random external ip's ignoring the ip it came in on.
Unfortunately I can't get away from having multiple external IP's in my setup so have to use a different vpn solution

Hi, I have read the documentation and googled with no result so please can someone brighter than me explain why in Mangle people first mark the connection and then use the connection mark to mark the packet instead of just marking the packets.. The reason I ask is that I have monitored this process ...

thanks a lot that did the trick - I have had a look through the packet flow diagram and the documentation and don't fully understand why this makes the difference, but it is working swell now so that's all I am worried about.
Cheers

I have tried all the combinations I can think of - that's why it is driving me crazy. Here is your suggestion [admin@m-nview] > queue simple print Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic 0 name="jono" target-addresses=192.168.1.54/32,192.168.1.118/32 dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 interface=a...

Hey guys, I haven't used queues before, but after adding some hungry folk to my network it has become necessary. I have read the manual on simple queues and it does seem very simple so then qhy can't I get it to work.. :? As you can see from the output below the queue is having no effect on traffic ...

Not sure if this is embarrassing or relief.. I upgraded them all to v3.10 and had the same results – per accident I found the cause being that when the AP is in scan mode nothing will find it including the laptop etc..

Thanks for the reading, this is all well and fine, but if I can't see the network or get a connection for a start it doesn't help. I doubt there is a physical problem due to the kit being brand new and several units acting the same way.

Am new to Mikrotik and have been reading lots. Have a setup to do for a ptp link to extend our network and have been supplied 2 rb133c running RouterOS 2.9.50 units for the purpose. I have them on my desk and have simply setup the wireless cards using /interface wireless set wlan1 ssid="p2ptest...